Well I just got confermation regarding the GT rulespack that Yriel is allowed but the Nightspinners aren't. This means that instead of my 2 Nightspinners I'm probably going to be using 2 Fire Prisms, list will remain basically the same besides that swap. It should still be a viable list and most tournaments around here don't allow Nightspinners anyways so I guess this will make practicing like this easier.Yriel 155
5 DA Waveserpent Spirit stones, tl scatterlaser, shurikan cannon pintle 195
5 DA Waveserpent Spirit stones, tl scatterlaser, shurikan cannon pintle 195
5 DA Waveserpent Spirit stones, tl scatterlaser, shurikan cannon pintle 195
6 FD's Waveserpent Spirit stones, tl shurikan cannon 206
6 FD's Waveserpent Spirit stones, tl shurikan cannon 206
9 FD's Waveserpent Spirit stones, tl scatterlaser, shurikan cannon pintle 296
Fire Prism Spirit stones 125
Fire Prism Spirit stones 125
1698 pts.
Now It's time to get those fire Prism turrets magnetized!
Well, not allowing the spinner is a shame, because they are labeled as "official" rules in the WD, basicaly the same as the old BA WD rules after the DA codex was launched in ed4.
ReplyDeleteStill, I rather prefer having Yriel+prism tanks, than fielding spinners with the crappy vanilla autarch, who just can't hold a candle to most other HQ choices. S3 for a IC, who get geared for close combat, just sucks.
Well I guess having Yriel is better then the Nightspinners eventhough I have yet to face a marine player to find if he is effective at all in combat. (only played him against marines where his S6 ap3 doesn't do all that much.
ReplyDeleteThat's a shame, I mean it does have an official stamp in the entry, it's not FW. Sorry that the Judges were being stupid :(
ReplyDeleteIndeed it does but Apparently that's just for show. Well most tournaments around here don't allow them so It will make GT practise easier since now I will take Fire Prisms which are codex legal :D Magnetized the turrets so I can switch it back and forth. The army looks pretty stunnig even unpainted :)
ReplyDelete